Phosphate Binders - Pros and Cons

Calcium carbonate ...
3K
Description

Phosphate Binders - Pros and Cons



Calcium carbonate (TumsTM) 

 - Most inexpensive, antacid properties useful for reflux and peptic ulcer disease 

Calcium Acetate (PhosLo) 

 - Relatively inexpensive, less GI calcium absorption compared to Ca carbonate 

Aluminum hydroxide (Amphogel) 

 - Most effective, potent binder, inexpensive 

Sevelamer-HCI (RenageI) 

 - Calcium and metal-free binder; may have ancillary benefits such as lipid lowering, uric acid lowering, anti-inflammatory effect. 



Sevelamer Carbonate (Renvela) 

 - Calcium and metal-free binder; may have ancillary benefits (see above), no metabolic acidosis. 

 - Improved GI tolerance. 

Lanthanum Carbonate (Fosrenol) 

 - No calcium load. Low pill burden. 

Magnesium based (MagneBind) 

 - Minimal calcium load. 

 - Anti-constipating. 

Trivalent iron containing binders (sucroferric oxyhydroxide Velphoro, ferric citrate Auryxia)

 - No calcium load. Low pill burden 

 - May supply additional Fe, decrease ESA 



Dr. Edgar V. Lerma @edgarvlermamd - Nephrology Secrets https://amzn.to/34t5DgJ



#Phosphate #Binders #Table #Comparison #Pharmacology #Nephrology
Contributed by

Dr. Gerald Diaz
@GeraldMD
Board Certified Internal Medicine Hospitalist, GrepMed Editor in Chief πŸ‡΅πŸ‡­ πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ - Sign up for an account to like, bookmark and upload images to contribute to our community platform. Follow us on IG:  https://www.instagram.com/grepmed/ | Twitter: https://twitter.com/grepmeded/
Medical jobs
view all

0 Comments

Related content